The People Transformation Economy: A New Framework for Meaning and Motivation at Work

Are your employees being changed by their work, or are they just turning up for it?

The idea may sound abstract, but it has practical implications. Drawing on the work of two researchers outside HR, this framework offers a way to create purposeful and fulfilling workplaces, whatever your company mission may be, from logistics to social enterprise.

What was Learned from The Experience Economy

Joe Pine and James Gilmore wrote The Experience Economy in 1999, setting out a framework that continues to offer a useful perspective on the value organizations create.

I see this progression as a useful way to think about how products compete and command a price. At one end are undifferentiated commodities, which compete largely on price. Commodities become goods. Goods become services. Services become experiences. At the highest level of value, experiences become transformations. The idea is that the most economically valuable thing you can offer someone isn't a product or even an experience; it's a change in them. You're not selling a gym membership, you're selling a stronger body. You're not selling an MBA, you're selling a different way of thinking. The customer becomes someone different through what they consume.

In my first book, Built for People, I argued that work is a product (a subscription product) which your People Team are the product managers of building: the Employee Experience product. This product sits alongside your Consumer Product and Fiscal Product (shares, investor interest) as a symbiotic system that drives your company towards success.

If work is a product we choose, it must serve a purpose in our lives. Understanding that purpose is essential to designing the Employee Experience: what do people need their work to do for them?

This is where the work of Amy Wrzesniewski, a Yale organizational psychologist, offers another useful perspective. Her research categorizes how people relate to their work. Not by job title or sector, but by orientation. You can see your work as a job(a transaction: time for money, no more), a career (a vehicle for progression and status), or a calling (work that is inseparable from identity, where the meaning is intrinsic). Her research found that orientation isn't determined by the work itself. Hospital cleaners who saw their role as central to patient recovery described their work as a calling. Lawyers who felt trapped in their practice described it as a job. Same structure, very different relationship with what that structure means.

While writing my first book, I saw a clear connection to People strategy. My second book explores that connection: how can modern leaders build workplaces that offer a sense of purpose? Bringing the People Transformation Economy together with Wrzesniewski's research gives leaders a framework for examining what employees need from work and how their People practices can support it.

Job, Career, Or Calling? A Lesson in People Culture

A calling, in Pine's language, is a transformation. When someone experiences their work as a calling, the work is changing them: building their sense of identity, deepening their skills, connecting them to something larger. The transaction goes both ways. The organization gets discretionary effort, loyalty, and genuine investment. The person gains a reason to be there that doesn't disappear when Glassdoor shows them a better offer elsewhere.

Most People strategies focus on the experience layer. People Teams are skilled at designing experiences, and for many employees that is what they are seeking at work: a career. People Teams have onboarding portals, offsites, wellbeing stipends, flexible working frameworks, and beautifully produced culture decks to support this kind of positioning. These things matter. For some workplaces, this is enough: their employees are looking for experiences that support their career. Others are looking for more. They are seeking transformations. After all, an oat milk flat white in a nice office is an experience. Watching someone become a significantly better version of themselves through their work? That's a transformation. One of those is substantially harder to copy.

The practical implication is this: if you're designing Employee Experiences as you would products (and you should be), the question isn't just "what do employees experience?" but "what do employees become?" That's a different brief entirely.

Does your Program Reinforce Your Employee’s Full Potential?

A few ways to stress-test this in your own programs:

• Your performance framework: is it designed to evaluate people, or to develop them? A calling orientation requires that employees can genuinely see their own growth. If your feedback process produces a score and a PDF that nobody takes seriously and respects, it's an experience at best (and probably not a good one).
• Your manager capability work: managers are the single biggest lever on whether someone experiences their work as a job or a calling. Not because they bestow meaning, but because they create the conditions for it. A manager who connects work to purpose, who names growth when it's happening, who gives people problems worth solving, that's transformation-oriented people management.
• Your onboarding: you have a genuinely short window to set the orientation frame. If onboarding is mostly compliance and system logins, you're communicating: this is a job. If it connects people to mission, introduces them to colleagues doing meaningful work, and explains whythe role exists, you're at least pointing toward calling.

One important caveat: Wrzesniewski's research is clear that you can't manufacture a calling orientation, and you'd be right to be suspicious of any organization that tries. What you can do is remove the conditions that actively prevent it. Unclear expectations, bad managers, work that feels pointless, no visible progression, these reliably push people toward the job orientation. Fixing those isn't inspirational. It's competent People management.

Pine's transformation economy isn't asking you to turn your People function into a spiritual retreat. It's asking you to take seriously the question of what your employees are becoming, and whether your programmes are actually designed with that in mind.

Turning Employee Transformation into a Competitive Advantage

For organizations that want to compete on transformation, this calls for a deliberate investment in People practices that support employees' growth.

If you are building a workplace that aims to occupy a different position in the market, examine the gap between the experience you currently offer, and the transformation employees seek. That gap can be your roadmap.

Save 30% on Purpose and Work with code AHR30.